It is with this mindset that it shocks me that a label with this strength on it's roster has apparently lost 5.9 million dollars in the last year (according to inthemix.com.au). I hope that this is somehow false. I know that we post lots of mp3's up, but myself and alot of others passionate about some of the modular artists purchase their cd's legitimately.
Nearly 6 million dollars is a fucking lot of money to lose in a year, and according to ITM, it isn't their first year of losses , they apparently lost $1.8 million in 2007 and $2.6 million in 2006. Did daft punk charge too much when modular helped organise nevernever land? Lets hope they have spent lots of money on recording records and they will sell really well and tour lots. Either that or Universal Music being one of their half owners, will not let them continue down this slippery slope.
Maybe they need to kick the shit out of the avalanches and get them to release their sophomore record, then we can all have a sexy party?
Here is a van she tech remix of a pretty classic Utah Saints track. What will van she do if they don't have a label? Join ajax's label haha?
do artists make more money from touring or from record sales?
ReplyDeletei would be more inclined to think touring
I heard the call out fee for the daft mafia was 2 million euros...
ReplyDelete6 million? is thier turnover even that much? fuck me!
ReplyDeleteS, i heard an interview with some bands on the J that artists make more money touring these days because of the internet and free downloads..
Truth is, very few people purchase electronica music unless its mainstream like the presets or whatnot.
The issue for Modular would seem to me the lack of any financial management. Its hard to aquire information about the management or who runs what part of the business but id say it comes down to some serious mismanagement.
They are half owned by Universal Music, so it would suggest to me that someone in their would know how to manage a record label. I dare say they would have orders at the moment to fix up the company or cut all dead weight, which could mean alot of the smaller artists on the roster.
ReplyDeleteJust because they are owned by Universal doesnt mean that the people running Modular know what they are doing.
ReplyDeleteIts hard to get any information on the company because nothing is publicly released about its management or finances so we can only assume that thier costs are way too high for a firm like itself.
Maybe they should give Pedro of the Bangers crew a call and get some tips
Modular spend huge amounts on PR and publicity. Their whole thing is new media and pop culture which is probably the most expensive market to reach because it requires so much grassroots work with the segment. The other catch with this is that their objectives of awareness for the artists on their label often dont translate to sales.
ReplyDeleteI reckon they're struggling by trying to invest in their artists to keep them happy (not leaving for the big labels) while they grow their portfolio of larger acts. I dont think its too uncommon for an independent label to record a loss while they are trying to enhance their profile. Universal is footing half the bill anyway. Universal would have a substantial influence on top management. Modular isn't run by fuckups that had nothing better to do than promote a few mates bands, with influence from a major label, I presume they have some idea of any problems they face
"I reckon they're struggling by trying to invest in their artists to keep them happy (not leaving for the big labels) while they grow their portfolio of larger acts"
ReplyDeleteI'm 100% with what you said here Ben.
With an artist lineup including
Jack Johnson
Bumblebeez
Cut Copy
Van She
Bang Gang DJs
MSTRKRFT
Wolfmother
Presets
Avalanches
Black Keys
Muscles
NYPC
Klaxons
Why wouldn't you throw a buttload of money at them to keep them on your label while you are lifting its profile?